As to whether or not you use rhyme and how “modern” you areThere’s something for both sides here. But I think it’s significant that Koch uses the word “probably” twice, but I also think those two last lines are perceptive (although I suspect he is tweaking a metrical nose or two with that double your easy pleasure.) I always loved reading Frost, those “easy vocable lines”, but never understood meter myself, until I read Timothy Steele’s book.
It is something your genius can decide on every morning
When you get out of bed. What a clear day! Good luck at it!
Though meter is probably, and rhyme too, probably, dead
For a while, except in narrative stanzas. You try it out.
The pleasure of the easy inflection between meter and these easy vocable lines
Is a pleasure, if you are able to have it, you are unlikely to renounce.
I used it as a text book in an adult education class I taught on form and I saw poets write proficiently in meter who had never got it before themselves. If one paragraph in the entire book is key, it is this one: “In this respect we may think of iambic lines as mountain ranges. Peaks and valleys alternate. But every peak is not an Everest, and every valley is not a Grand Canyon.”
I guess what I’m trying to say is I get it now and am unlikely to renounce it (although I’m sure I’ll experiment.) But I’m not a proselytizing fundamentalist. And I’m not going to snicker at someone who tripped over her feet. Like one of my favorite metricists once sang:
I never asked for your crutch.
Now don't ask for mine.
2 comments:
The main thing should always be to have fun. All too often the poets who get the attention - because they are the pushiest, perhaps - are the ones who take themselves and their Art way too freakin' seriously.
amen!
Post a Comment