Sonnet August Twenty-ThreeI should say “sonnet” of course, because these are not the classic kind. I’ve addressed that previously and have adopted Annie Finch’s nomenclature: formal and semi-formal deformations of the form. I’ve been leading more to the formal deformations of late, leaving out the rhyme for the most part. But not the reason I hope. K. Silem Mohammad addresses a question posed by Mike Snider yesterday in a very reasoned post which ultimately revolves around a “closed, static mode of taxonomy” and a “dynamic mode of functional ontology,” which despite the high-faluting speech, is exactly right. I’ve known some to argue that any poem other than one in meter is not a poem, but prose in broken lines. And I’ve heard some argue that random prose is a poem. There’s no bridging that gulf (and I certainly couldn't or wouldn't try). It’s too fundamental, almost theological. I probably sit somewhere in the middle, as usual. And, if any one cares, it should be understood when I write such sonnets that I’m writing “deformations of a sonnet,” but just sonnet for short.
First the sun—December-high but April
intense—allowing dark to gather still
in shadows—midnight-cool-opaque—but brief.
The crickets next—low-lying bas relief
of higher frequencies—earth-treble-sound
—gathered still within that shadow-ground.
Dew—it lacquers every car with dash,
and on the road in shadows toward that splash
of light—atomic-bright—completely fair
—refocusing near molecules of air
in horizontal motion towards the river—
rippled-indigo—a liquid shiver
—reflection of illuminated skies.
This morning is opening my eyes.
~Son Rivers 2005
THERE AND GONE ….
-
Here is an autumn hokku kindly shared by a reader in Japan: In a moment,It
no longer is —The rainbow. When we look at English poetry, it is common to
ask t...
3 weeks ago
No comments:
Post a Comment